List archive

• 00/01/02
  • RE: Re[4]: historiography (Ken, again), Niels Peter Lemche
  • Re: Re[2]: historiography (Another Peter event), Ian Hutchesson
  • Re: Re[4]: historiography (Peter, again), Moshe Shulman
  • Re: Serpent Seed Doctrine ('eTH in Gen. 4:1), Ben Crick
  • Re: Re[4]: historiography (Moshe, again), Ian Hutchesson
  • Re: Tel Dan Inscription, Lee R. Martin
  • Re: historiography (Ken, again), kdlitwak
  • Re: historiography (Ken, again), kdlitwak
  • Re: b(l xmh in Nahum 1:2, clayton stirling bartholomew
  • Re: Re[8]: 1 Sam 31:5: was Saul necessarily dead?, Dave Washburn
• 00/01/03
  • Re: <wayyiqtol> & attempts at English descriptive grammars, Rolf Furuli
  • Re: Re[2]: historiography (Peter: was Jonathan), Ian Hutchesson
  • Re: jection (Ken, again), Ian Hutchesson
  • Re: Tel Dan Inscription, Ruthy & Baruch
  • Surprise!, Ruthy & Baruch
  • English descriptive grammars and more irrelevances, Ian Hutchesson
  • Re[4]: <wayyiqtol> again, Rolf Furuli
  • RE: historiography (Ken, again), Niels Peter Lemche
  • Re: Surprise! as element of HUMOR for which sudden turns of events is key, Harold Helm
  • Re: Surprise! when Balaam's donkey saw the angel, Harold Helm
  • Re: historiography (Jonathan: was Solomon), Jonathan D. Safren
  • SV: Re[6]: Melchizedek (More Dave) (Peter's response), Thomas L. Thompson
  • Re[2]: <wayyiqtol> & attempts at English descriptive grammar, peter_kirk
  • Re: English descriptive grammars and more irrelevances, Rolf Furuli
  • Re[6]: historiography: Babylonian Chronicle tc., peter_kirk
  • SV: Re[6]: historiography: Babylonian Chronicle tc., Niels Peter Lemche
  • Re: attempts at English descriptive grammar, Dave Washburn
  • Re: Surprise!, Norman Swift
  • Re: <wayyiqtol> again (G.Hatav), Alviero Niccacci
  • Tel Dan & David, Robert Vining

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.