b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Re: Re[8]: 1 Sam 31:5: was Saul necessarily dead?

From: "Dave Washburn" <dwashbur AT nyx.net>
To: b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu
Subject: Re: Re[8]: 1 Sam 31:5: was Saul necessarily dead?
Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2000 20:40:35 -0700

Peter,
> I have abandoned this "not really dead" suggestion and thus any
> further objections to it are both pointless and objectionable. End of
> discussion.
>
> When in response to the "the Amalekite was lying" interpretation, I
> assume your words "just of reader distortion on your part" are
> directed at NPL and Dave Washburn, whose preferred interpretation this
> is, and so I will leave it to them to respond.

It'll have to be NPL then, because I have quit reading Ian's posts.

Dave Washburn
http://www.nyx.net/~dwashbur
Teach me your way, O Lord, and I will walk in your truth;
give me an undivided heart that I may fear your name.
Psalm 86:11

Re[4]: 1 Sam 31:5: was Saul necessarily dead?, peter_kirk, 01/01/2000
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: Re[4]: 1 Sam 31:5: was Saul necessarily dead?, Niels Peter Lemche, 01/01/2000
- Re: Re[4]: 1 Sam 31:5: was Saul necessarily dead?, Ian Hutchesson, 01/01/2000
- Re[6]: 1 Sam 31:5: was Saul necessarily dead?, peter_kirk, 01/01/2000
- Re[6]: 1 Sam 31:5: was Saul necessarily dead?, peter_kirk, 01/01/2000
- Re: Re[6]: 1 Sam 31:5: was Saul necessarily dead?, Ian Hutchesson, 01/02/2000
- Re[8]: 1 Sam 31:5: was Saul necessarily dead?, peter_kirk, 01/02/2000
- Re: Re[8]: 1 Sam 31:5: was Saul necessarily dead?, Dave Washburn, 01/02/2000