Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: David Kowis <dkowis AT shlrm.org>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process
  • Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 09:33:27 -0600

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Jason Flatt wrote:
>
> I agree. I suspect, even if it were made a mandatory part of the voting
> process, that most folks will not even bother responding (due to lack of
> time
> or interest or whatever), if their vote is correctly represented and the
> count is accurate.
>
> And if it were a mandatory part of the process, how would you enforce it?
> The
> votes been taken, the count is done, the results were posted, n won, now
> everyone let me know that your vote was correctly represented. Why should
> I?
> Or else, what?

<stupidity>We'll follow your email home and kill your dog.</stupidity>

- --
David Kowis

ISO Team Lead - www.sourcemage.org
Source Mage GNU/Linux

Progress isn't made by early risers. It's made by lazy men trying to
find easier ways to do something.
- Robert Heinlein

Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
- Arthur C. Clarke

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
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=8+IJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page