Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Jeremy Blosser (emrys)" <jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process
  • Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 08:52:34 -0600

On Feb 10, Andrew ruskie Levstik [ruskie AT mages.ath.cx] wrote:
> > As long as we keep the auditing process simple while maintaining
> > anonymity I think that would be fine.
>
> An amendment to the auditing proccess...
> Once the tally is done and posted to the ML ppl respond to it with
> Yes my vote is properly counted or no mine isn't.

Requiring this seems much to me, do people really think we need to go that
far?

Attachment: pgpPwX82EWI4q.pgp
Description: PGP signature




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page