sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: David Kowis <dkowis AT shlrm.org>
- To: sm-discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process
- Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 12:55:47 -0600
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Jeremy Blosser (emrys) wrote:
> On Feb 10, Sergey A. Lipnevich [sergey AT sourcemage.org] wrote:
>> David Kowis wrote:
>>> The vote collector is trusted to fix the vote, and then republish the
>>> results. The results are a list
>>> 1: y
>>> 2: n
>>> 3: y
>>> etc...
>>>
>>> 3 emails the collector, with, "Hey, I voted n!"
>>>
>>> collector fixes 3 and republishes the list.
>>>
>> Well, if I'm the collector and I decide to rig the vote, I will simply
>> disregard private mail like this and fix nothing. You *must* go public
>> if your vote is wrong. I don't think anonymity works without public
>> confirmation of correctly published votes.
>
> It's not this absolute, and it can be dealt with via policy. An example
> policy would be:
>
> - voters cast votes
> - counter publishes the vote
> - someone says "I contest these results"
> - a larger group, perhaps a defined group of a few leads or something,
> looks at the votes and confirms them
> - if this group finds an issue, it is dealt with
> - if this group doesn't find an issue, they say so
> - if the contesting person still contests, *then* we move to a stage where
> people confirm their specific votes, and those who claim a disparity
> would produce their signed receipt of their vote from the counter to
> prove the listed vote isn't theirs
>
> Yes, at some point we perhaps have to publish the vote to resolve a
> contest, but it would be an extreme case. We don't need it for regular
> elections or even basic types of contested votes.
This is what I was going to say, but he said it first, so I'm just going
to throw my support behind this instead of being wordy :)
- --
David Kowis
ISO Team Lead - www.sourcemage.org
Source Mage GNU/Linux
Progress isn't made by early risers. It's made by lazy men trying to
find easier ways to do something.
- Robert Heinlein
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
- Arthur C. Clarke
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)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=h949
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 02/10/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, David Kowis, 02/10/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, Jason Flatt, 02/10/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, David Kowis, 02/10/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 02/10/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, David Kowis, 02/10/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 02/10/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, David Kowis, 02/10/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 02/10/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 02/10/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, David Kowis, 02/10/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 02/10/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, David Kowis, 02/10/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 02/10/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 02/10/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 02/10/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 02/11/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, Mathieu L., 02/11/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, Mathieu L., 02/11/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 02/11/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, Eric Sandall, 02/11/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.