Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Mathieu L." <lejatorn AT smgl.homelinux.net>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process
  • Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:04:16 +0100

Same here.

Cheers,
Mathieu.

On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 12:57:28PM +0100, Andrew ruskie Levstik wrote:
> > As long as we keep the auditing process simple while maintaining
> > anonymity I think that would be fine.
>
> An amendment to the auditing proccess...
> Once the tally is done and posted to the ML ppl respond to it with
> Yes my vote is properly counted or no mine isn't.
>
> Thus confirming it all to all of us. It's not that I don't trust
> the vote counter it's the system I don't trust. And if it's auditable
> and confirmable then I have no issues whatsoever.
>
> --
> Andrew "ruskie" Levstik
> Source Mage GNU/Linux Games grimoire guru
> Geek/Hacker/Tinker
>
> Hacker FAQ: http://www.plethora.net/%7eseebs/faqs/hacker.html
>
> Key id = A7A9E461
> Key fingerprint = 757E C16B F5B7 DC27 B003 CCED CF95 3A77 A7A9 E461
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss

--
"Monde de merde."
Georges Abitbol.
--




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page