sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: David Kowis <dkowis AT shlrm.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process
- Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 11:53:08 -0600
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Sergey A. Lipnevich wrote:
> David Kowis wrote:
>
>> I don't think so. I think if someone's vote is misrepresented, then
>> they'll make it known. I don't think we need everyone to confirm it.
>>
> You're contradicting yourself here. If a person wants to keep the vote
> private, than raising an issue with misrepresentation is the same as
> disclosing the vote. But remember, s/he is supposedly trying to
> *prevent* this. You're complicating the system (private votes) but add
> no safeguards. If votes are private, than I think ~90% confirmation of
> correct vote is required.
> OTOH, if you don't require a voter to disclose his/her vote but it's
> enough to say "my vote was misrepresented" to discard the whole vote,
> then everyone can use this as a means of throwing away unfavorable outcome.
>
Okay, so they don't tell the entire list that their vote was
misrepresented. Just the vote collector. Problem solved.
- --
David Kowis
ISO Team Lead - www.sourcemage.org
Source Mage GNU/Linux
Progress isn't made by early risers. It's made by lazy men trying to
find easier ways to do something.
- Robert Heinlein
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
- Arthur C. Clarke
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
iQGVAwUBQ+zTA8nf+vRw63ObAQoFswwAhGgXT4FouxhuCdnZ8vWB1vBivfAcqKM0
4zfThajU3KgHhwU+B2wBSBMEkf/iz48KZePIS61VwKQcgsmraeQQdJe8qoyef1gS
dEGVfJPQ6ReZr1tJtxKtaOFE8/bvkPu7aBEL5Fr3U3SPF+Mjy83oTb+xbTs25TT3
+4RAmMnNq2E4GNL7HtCIDlqKDQ4aqUEuUOJbXdVVT/GPMfb4rfStLwS7nYPVDE8x
3peUn+ebbn0nrHm7JVEvjDOss2+308WIPOTb4GSVJ8+nmffG7FZZPz7ZzBVYnsd2
U15SS35unJ8XSjcj/2aJa/heDDYYLTa86/U3T6h3Ckp6uskmWwpW9/uX4K57B9m6
OaxAqy4LsVa7SfeCqCvL3xfuqmvLihNBhfcdAwAN0xk22Trvvvedlxh/M6qXqywz
fTDTjxGUjBeLFzRLToKIRKkJVL2RR9TGW//v+Rbg/oBTKnAbl3PGJa3FDEdi9wFp
fBMLOH/4ESLjbJGRkcGQsA70IGv+tcaa
=u9tg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, David Kowis, 02/09/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 02/09/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, Eric Sandall, 02/10/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 02/10/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, Mathieu L., 02/10/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 02/10/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, David Kowis, 02/10/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, Jason Flatt, 02/10/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, David Kowis, 02/10/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 02/10/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, David Kowis, 02/10/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 02/10/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, David Kowis, 02/10/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 02/10/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 02/10/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, David Kowis, 02/10/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 02/10/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, David Kowis, 02/10/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 02/10/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 02/10/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 02/10/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.