Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Andrew <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>
  • To: SM Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process
  • Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 08:33:38 -0800

On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 09:17:24PM -0600, Jeremy Blosser (emrys) wrote:
> On Feb 09, Sergey A. Lipnevich [sergey AT sourcemage.org] wrote:
>
> Do others have comments on the original proposal? Particularly those in
> favor of closed voting, since this is essentially proposed as a compromise
> between those that want anonymous votes and those that want auditability?

I think it is a good compromise between the two. We can always try it,
and if it doesnt work, we can address the issue again, just as we've
adjusted the voting process in the past.

As for the vote confirmation, that could be an optional step if your
vote was counted properly, and a manditory step if you vote was *not*
counted correctly.

-Andrew

--
_________________________________________________________________________
| Andrew D. Stitt | acedit at armory.com | astitt at sourcemage.org |
| irc: afrayedknot | Sorcery Team Lead | ftp://t.armory.com/ |
| 1024D/D39B096C | 76E4 728A 04EE 62B2 A09A 96D7 4D9E 239B D39B 096C |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page