Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: David Kowis <dkowis AT shlrm.org>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process
  • Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 09:12:31 -0600

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Jeremy Blosser (emrys) wrote:
> On Feb 10, Andrew ruskie Levstik [ruskie AT mages.ath.cx] wrote:
>>> As long as we keep the auditing process simple while maintaining
>>> anonymity I think that would be fine.
>> An amendment to the auditing proccess...
>> Once the tally is done and posted to the ML ppl respond to it with
>> Yes my vote is properly counted or no mine isn't.
>
> Requiring this seems much to me, do people really think we need to go that
> far?

I don't think so. I think if someone's vote is misrepresented, then
they'll make it known. I don't think we need everyone to confirm it.

- --
David Kowis

ISO Team Lead - www.sourcemage.org
Source Mage GNU/Linux

Progress isn't made by early risers. It's made by lazy men trying to
find easier ways to do something.
- Robert Heinlein

Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
- Arthur C. Clarke

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
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=ntZR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page