Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Andrew <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment
  • Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 20:00:48 -0800

On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 09:29:13PM +0100, Andrew ruskie Levstik wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Jeremy Blosser (emrys) wrote :
>
> >
> > However, I'm not in favor of moving voting to the web sites. It's a whole
> > lot easier to audit an emailed vote. If it's in drupal we have to be able
> > to audit the vote from the browser to the web server to the database to
> > some external record. Even if we use SSL between the user and the web
> > site, once submitted anyone with access to the web server or drupal's
> > components or the database can change it. The best way to do verification
> > end-to-end would still be to have developers sign their votes before
> > injecting them into the system.
> >
>
> I'm against web voting as well...

Me too.

-Andrew

--
_________________________________________________________________________
| Andrew D. Stitt | acedit at armory.com | astitt at sourcemage.org |
| irc: afrayedknot | Sorcery Team Lead | ftp://t.armory.com/ |
| 1024D/D39B096C | 76E4 728A 04EE 62B2 A09A 96D7 4D9E 239B D39B 096C |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Attachment: pgpRVAND7wS3P.pgp
Description: PGP signature




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page