sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Andrew <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment
- Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 20:00:48 -0800
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 09:29:13PM +0100, Andrew ruskie Levstik wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Jeremy Blosser (emrys) wrote :
>
> >
> > However, I'm not in favor of moving voting to the web sites. It's a whole
> > lot easier to audit an emailed vote. If it's in drupal we have to be able
> > to audit the vote from the browser to the web server to the database to
> > some external record. Even if we use SSL between the user and the web
> > site, once submitted anyone with access to the web server or drupal's
> > components or the database can change it. The best way to do verification
> > end-to-end would still be to have developers sign their votes before
> > injecting them into the system.
> >
>
> I'm against web voting as well...
Me too.
-Andrew
--
_________________________________________________________________________
| Andrew D. Stitt | acedit at armory.com | astitt at sourcemage.org |
| irc: afrayedknot | Sorcery Team Lead | ftp://t.armory.com/ |
| 1024D/D39B096C | 76E4 728A 04EE 62B2 A09A 96D7 4D9E 239B D39B 096C |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
pgpRVAND7wS3P.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/04/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment,
Eric Sandall, 01/04/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/04/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment,
Eric Sandall, 01/04/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/04/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment, Eric Sandall, 01/04/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/04/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 01/04/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/04/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 01/04/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment,
Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 01/04/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment, Andrew, 01/04/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment,
David Kowis, 01/04/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment, Ladislav Hagara, 01/05/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 01/05/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment, Eric Sandall, 01/05/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment,
Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 01/04/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/05/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment, Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 01/05/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/05/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment, Seth Alan Woolley, 01/05/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment, Eric Sandall, 01/06/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 01/05/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 01/04/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/04/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment,
Eric Sandall, 01/04/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/04/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment,
Eric Sandall, 01/04/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.