Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Jeremy Blosser (emrys)" <jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org>
  • To: SM Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment
  • Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 09:00:33 -0600

On Jan 05, Ladislav Hagara [ladislav.hagara AT unob.cz] wrote:
> > However, I'm not in favor of moving voting to the web sites. It's a whole
> > lot easier to audit an emailed vote.
>
>
> Audit? :-)
> PL just email us the results and we all have to believe him.
> If PL wanted to manipulate the voting we have no possibility to prevent
> it, moreover if the particular votes are secret.

I'm not really happy with that setup either. The first step to fixing it
is getting the votes signed, so that if/when we get some others able to
confirm the vote results we can be sure they weren't modified.

Attachment: pgpaj7HoEDmrE.pgp
Description: PGP signature




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page