Public SourceMage Discussion List

["Sergey A. Lipnevich" <sergey AT sourcemage.org>]

All,

I object because I'm not planning on getting GPG key anytime soon. If I 
needed it for other things I would get it, but having it only for SMGL 
election is kind of too much too ask. If everyone else feels different, 
I'm willing to reconsider.
Thanks,

Sergey.

Eric Sandall wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Now that the vote is finished I'd like to propose an amendment to our
> voting rules[0].
>
> I would like to add a clause specifying that a (valid ;)) GPG signed
> e-mail is required for all vote-/nomination-related e-mails. I was
> thinking of only requiring this for votes, but then thought that
> nominations also require nominations, acceptance, and a second, which
> we'd also want to verify, and then you may also want the nomination
> and vote requests themselves signed along with the results, just in
> case an imposter me comes along. ;)
>
> All 'valid' keys are those listed on:
> http://www.sourcemage.org/keysigning (which I'll be moving from
> http://wiki.sourcemage.org/smgl-keysigning since we don't want just
> anyone modifying GPG fingerprints ;)).
>