sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Seth Alan Woolley <seth AT positivism.org>
- To: "Sergey A. Lipnevich" <sergey AT optimaltec.com>
- Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment
- Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 11:49:12 -0800
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 02:43:18PM -0500, Sergey A. Lipnevich wrote:
> Andrew "ruskie" Levstik wrote:
> > It is generaly suggested that personal gpg key != grimoire gpg key
> > And nobody will include anybody elses gpg key into the grimoire(re:
> > guru.gpg).
> >
> Good enough, thanks! I was concerned because Eric mentioned that my key
> has to be listed somewhere and I really don't want it to be anywhere it
> doesn't belong.
Just the key id and fingerprint (on a developer keys webpage). Even
with that, one still needs the public key to be able to use it, so your
double-secrecy requirement should still work out ok (some people like to
not publicize their public key to anybody outside their inner circle).
Seth
--
Seth Alan Woolley [seth at positivism.org], SPAM/UCE is unauthorized
Quality Assurance Team Leader & Security Team: Source Mage GNU/linux
Linux so advanced, it may as well be magic http://www.sourcemage.org
Key id 63C1E02F = E07A FB0E 5925 CE4A 6526 2AD5 1782 FEC2 63C1 E02F
Attachment:
pgpuaLQQ1Q8mw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 01/04/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment,
Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 01/04/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment, Andrew, 01/04/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment,
David Kowis, 01/04/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment, Ladislav Hagara, 01/05/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 01/05/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment, Eric Sandall, 01/05/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment,
Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 01/04/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/05/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment, Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 01/05/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/05/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment, Seth Alan Woolley, 01/05/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment, Eric Sandall, 01/06/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 01/05/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 01/04/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.