Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
  • To: SM Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment
  • Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 10:40:42 -0800 (PST)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Sergey A. Lipnevich wrote:
All,

I object because I'm not planning on getting GPG key anytime soon. If I
needed it for other things I would get it, but having it only for SMGL
election is kind of too much too ask. If everyone else feels different,
I'm willing to reconsider.
<snip>

How else do you propose we verify the sender is who they are? Not that
our elections are world shaking, but I would like to have some modicum
of authenticity to show I am recording the correct vote for the
correct person. ;)

- -sandalle

- --
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDvBauHXt9dKjv3WERAvb6AJoCWLR6BpOlM8L72GM3+bEzoteWqgCgxY5u
EgPvtkYgMri04erkG9sJc0g=
=D6/6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page