Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Sergey A. Lipnevich wrote:
> I'd say we only attempt to verify a vote if there's a doubt or a request
> to do it. That is, the vote is counted if it's received by the lead who
> does the counting. When the list is published for everyone to see,
> interested party(ies) can object and/or ask for verification.
>
> Additionally, I'd propose using a Drupal plug-in (if available, or some
> re-purposed polls plug-in) and giving developers access to an online
> voting form. This process would be much easier to manage than email
> (e.g. my vote wouldn't have been lost because of the email being
> apparently lost in transit), and would be authenticated by Drupal.
<snip>

We'd need to add a 'Developer' Role in Drupal and add all developers
to that Role as well as maintaining that list, in addition to the
other lists of developers we have. Granted, after the initial setup it
would take less work to conduct a vote. ;) I'd be okay with this if
someone would like to volunteer to help Jason (unless he wants to do
it himself ;)).

- -sandalle

- --
Eric Sandall                     |  Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us                  |  http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/          |  SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/  #196285  |  http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDvBx6HXt9dKjv3WERAjuhAJwNoaVy2PIqlxG3+OaFEjXAZmDsigCeK0Zp
KfCYsREITKjtCzAHExUK56g=
=BcTi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----