sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: "Sergey A. Lipnevich" <sergey AT sourcemage.org>
- To: SM Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment
- Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 12:18:33 -0500
Jeremy Blosser (emrys) wrote:
Not necessarily. I agree that it's not scalable to all Web visitors, but for developers a single self-signed certificate is a good start. I also agree that it's not the best practice to do things this way.I don't trust Verisign much anyway after their recent stunts, although I have to kind of trust them every time I buy something online, because I have no choice. Self-signed certificates are appropriate for a voting application I think. Eric can sign the certificate so we know it can be trusted, and that's it. I hope he charges less than Verisign for this :-).
That's not really how it works. Eric would have to create a CA to do that,
However, I'm not in favor of moving voting to the web sites. It's a wholeWell, the people has spoken :-) and nobody wants to vote online. I'd like to ask then that my voting-only GPG signature is not included into grimoire as I'm not going to sign any spells with it. Can this be done without overhead of any kind?
lot easier to audit an emailed vote. If it's in drupal we have to be able
Sergey.
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment, Eric Sandall, 01/04/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 01/04/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/04/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 01/04/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment,
Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 01/04/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment, Andrew, 01/04/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment,
David Kowis, 01/04/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment, Ladislav Hagara, 01/05/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 01/05/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment, Eric Sandall, 01/05/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment,
Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 01/04/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/05/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment, Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 01/05/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/05/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment, Seth Alan Woolley, 01/05/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment, Eric Sandall, 01/06/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 01/05/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 01/04/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/04/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.