Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Andrew \"ruskie\" Levstik" <ruskie AT mages.ath.cx>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment
  • Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 21:29:13 +0100

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jeremy Blosser (emrys) wrote :

>
> However, I'm not in favor of moving voting to the web sites. It's a whole
> lot easier to audit an emailed vote. If it's in drupal we have to be able
> to audit the vote from the browser to the web server to the database to
> some external record. Even if we use SSL between the user and the web
> site, once submitted anyone with access to the web server or drupal's
> components or the database can change it. The best way to do verification
> end-to-end would still be to have developers sign their votes before
> injecting them into the system.
>

I'm against web voting as well...


- --
Andrew "ruskie" Levstik
Source Mage GNU/Linux Games grimoire guru
Geek/Hacker/Tinker

Hacker FAQ: http://www.plethora.net/%7eseebs/faqs/hacker.html

Key id = A7A9E461
Key fingerprint = 757E C16B F5B7 DC27 B003 CCED CF95 3A77 A7A9 E461
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDvDBHz5U6d6ep5GERAmTUAJ0XAhidzxiUevB/KAXVHLN/5IhyGgCfa8/q
IG8vjvSkz1JddkdaZ7Iaf0A=
=1yfp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page