sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Martin Ruderer <martin AT lddd.org>
- To: Dufflebunk <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>
- Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies
- Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 01:54:40 +0200
On 10 Jul 2003 17:37:15 -0400
Dufflebunk <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net> wrote:
> A depends_grimoire (or grimoire_depends) would be a better solution.
Yeah.
> However, I would suggest making it like:
> grimoire_depends SPELL GRIMOIRE_NAME [GRIMOIRE_URL], or
> grimoire_depends SPELL [SPELL, ...] GRIMOIRE_NAME [GRIMOIRE_URL]
> The grimoire url would be optional and only needed for non-standard
> grimoires. If GRIMOIRE_NAME is default, it assumes you mean the
> grimoire located in element 0 of the GRIMOIRE_DIR
> (/etc/sorcery/local/grimoire).
Well, having $GRIMOIRE_NAME some default is okay, but it shouldn't be 0
in GRIMOIRE_DIR, rather something special. Extra var or something..
> This still means that the grimoires need unique names unless the url
> (if provided) were to be check in the grimorie's metadata.
Yeah, that's _the_ question, unique grimoire names or not, what does the
community say? Hello? Community? :-)
--
Martin
-
[SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies,
Geoffrey Derber, 07/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies,
Eric Sandall, 07/10/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies, Geoffrey Derber, 07/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies,
Dufflebunk, 07/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies,
Eric Sandall, 07/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies,
Martin Ruderer, 07/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies,
Dufflebunk, 07/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies,
Seth Woolley, 07/10/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies, Jason Flatt, 07/11/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies, Martin Ruderer, 07/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies,
Seth Woolley, 07/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies,
Dufflebunk, 07/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies,
Martin Ruderer, 07/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies,
Geoffrey Derber, 07/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies,
Jason Flatt, 07/11/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies,
Eric Sandall, 07/11/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies, Duane Malcolm, 07/11/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies,
Eric Sandall, 07/11/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies,
Jason Flatt, 07/11/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies,
Eric Sandall, 07/10/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies, Seth Woolley, 07/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 07/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies,
Martin Ruderer, 07/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 07/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies,
Geoffrey Derber, 07/10/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 07/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies,
Geoffrey Derber, 07/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 07/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies,
Martin Ruderer, 07/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies,
Eric Sandall, 07/10/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.