Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Geoffrey Derber <Geoffrey.Derber AT Trinity.edu>]

Sergey A. Lipnevich wrote:
> I think that we don't "have" a multi-grimoire approach, but that we're 
> stuck with the multi-grimoire approach. I'm trying to say politely that 
> this was a wrong decision that introduced problems that we're trying to 
> discuss without analyzing the cause.
>
> > surely have to deal with the update problem, but that should take place
> > in another thread. ;-)
> I'm trying to steer discussion in a way that I think is more productive. 
> I may be wrong, but that kind of goes with every message I send.
>
> Sergey.

I think it's a problem we'd have to deal with anyways.  Largely because 
even if we did not split our grimoire, we allow other people to create 
their own, and with growth, I'm seeing more public custom grimiores.  If 
people start using these other grimoire too, we'd still have to deal 
with this issue.

The other way would be to go completely back to the way we were prior to 
allowing multiple grimoires.

Geoff