Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Seth Woolley <seth AT tautology.org>
  • To: Dufflebunk <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>
  • Cc: sm-discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies
  • Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 16:03:57 -0700 (PDT)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Heh, I shouldn't have sent that last email out before checking for new
messages, but I just want to clarify that we shouldn't stick to element
zero. We should do the full cascading process... I might have a custom
grimoire in element zero.

Seth

On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Dufflebunk wrote:

> A depends_grimoire (or grimoire_depends) would be a better solution.
> However, I would suggest making it like:
> grimoire_depends SPELL GRIMOIRE_NAME [GRIMOIRE_URL], or
> grimoire_depends SPELL [SPELL, ...] GRIMOIRE_NAME [GRIMOIRE_URL]
> The grimoire url would be optional and only needed for non-standard
> grimoires. If GRIMOIRE_NAME is default, it assumes you mean the grimoire
> located in element 0 of the GRIMOIRE_DIR (/etc/sorcery/local/grimoire).
>
> This still means that the grimoires need unique names unless the url (if
> provided) were to be check in the grimorie's metadata.
>
> On Thu, 2003-07-10 at 18:15, Martin Ruderer wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Jul 2003 14:58:38 -0700 (PDT)
> > "Eric Sandall" <eric AT sandall.us> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Heh, hadn't thought of those. :) Yes, perhaps checking if the spell
> > > is available first, then requesting to add a grimoire second. As for
> > > devel/test/stable, we could just call those 'default' or some such for
> > > these purposes, or we could assume (most likely safely) that one of
> > > those(at least) is installed, so we'd never say 'depends
> > > default/<spell>' (I meant to mention that condition before, otherwise
> > > we'd have to change every spell's DEPENDS, and that would be a Bad
> > > Thing(TM)).
> >
> > How about having a command like
> > "grimoire_depends $grimoire $LISTOFSPELLS" in our grimoires for
> > inter-grimoire depends? It would install $grimoire if one of the spells
> > doesn't exist in currently installed grimoires. That could keep the
> > official grimoires consistent and wouldn't affect "user grimoires".
> >
> > (Just a short shot)
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
>

- --
Seth Alan Woolley <seth at tautology.org>, SPAM/UCE is unauthorized
Key id 7BEACC7D = 2978 0BD1 BA48 B671 C1EB 93F7 EDF4 3CDF 7BEA CC7D
Full Key at seth.tautology.org and pgp.mit.edu. info: www.gnupg.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE/DfDg7fQ833vqzH0RAskwAKDYLp73J6d6YS7dL7+BlccFcLrqywCaA5sl
W4CpJ90h/ksn0qzUXQsnmrs=
=IZJz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page