sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Dufflebunk <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>
- To: Martin Ruderer <martin AT lddd.org>
- Cc: sm-discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies
- Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 22:42:22 -0000
A depends_grimoire (or grimoire_depends) would be a better solution.
However, I would suggest making it like:
grimoire_depends SPELL GRIMOIRE_NAME [GRIMOIRE_URL], or
grimoire_depends SPELL [SPELL, ...] GRIMOIRE_NAME [GRIMOIRE_URL]
The grimoire url would be optional and only needed for non-standard
grimoires. If GRIMOIRE_NAME is default, it assumes you mean the grimoire
located in element 0 of the GRIMOIRE_DIR (/etc/sorcery/local/grimoire).
This still means that the grimoires need unique names unless the url (if
provided) were to be check in the grimorie's metadata.
On Thu, 2003-07-10 at 18:15, Martin Ruderer wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jul 2003 14:58:38 -0700 (PDT)
> "Eric Sandall" <eric AT sandall.us> wrote:
>
>
> > Heh, hadn't thought of those. :) Yes, perhaps checking if the spell
> > is available first, then requesting to add a grimoire second. As for
> > devel/test/stable, we could just call those 'default' or some such for
> > these purposes, or we could assume (most likely safely) that one of
> > those(at least) is installed, so we'd never say 'depends
> > default/<spell>' (I meant to mention that condition before, otherwise
> > we'd have to change every spell's DEPENDS, and that would be a Bad
> > Thing(TM)).
>
> How about having a command like
> "grimoire_depends $grimoire $LISTOFSPELLS" in our grimoires for
> inter-grimoire depends? It would install $grimoire if one of the spells
> doesn't exist in currently installed grimoires. That could keep the
> official grimoires consistent and wouldn't affect "user grimoires".
>
> (Just a short shot)
-
[SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies,
Geoffrey Derber, 07/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies,
Eric Sandall, 07/10/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies, Geoffrey Derber, 07/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies,
Dufflebunk, 07/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies,
Eric Sandall, 07/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies,
Martin Ruderer, 07/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies,
Dufflebunk, 07/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies,
Seth Woolley, 07/10/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies, Jason Flatt, 07/11/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies, Martin Ruderer, 07/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies,
Seth Woolley, 07/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies,
Dufflebunk, 07/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies,
Martin Ruderer, 07/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies,
Geoffrey Derber, 07/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies,
Jason Flatt, 07/11/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies,
Eric Sandall, 07/11/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies, Duane Malcolm, 07/11/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies,
Eric Sandall, 07/11/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies,
Jason Flatt, 07/11/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies,
Eric Sandall, 07/10/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies, Seth Woolley, 07/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 07/10/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies, Martin Ruderer, 07/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] cross grimoire dependencies,
Eric Sandall, 07/10/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.