permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: permaculture
List archive
- From: Michael Snow <msnow@valley.net>
- To: permaculture <permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [permaculture] Anti-semitism was Re: The Fed
- Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 13:05:16 -0400
Thank you, Bob. I'm glad someone agrees comments like this - about any group - are are neither constructive, supported by historical evidence, or considerate.
I wonder if you are the only one on the list that noticed this - and disappointed that it passed so easily.
Mike
On May 19, 2007, at 1:00 AM, Robert Waldrop wrote:
You were the one who posted racist comments in
this list. Don't try to segue into some kind of
incoherent internet shouting match to distract
attention from what you said. If you are so sick
of racism, then stop posting blatant racist
bigotry in this listserv.
Bob Waldrop, OKC
----- Original Message -----
From: "Martin Naylor" <martinwnaylor@yahoo.com.au>
AND I AM GOD DAMN SICK OF ANY RACIEST COMMENT -
THE YANKS INVENTED RACISM TO GIVE THEMSELVES A
REASON TO IMPORT BLACK SLAVES END OF STORY
PERMACULTURE STARTS AND ENDS IN THE HOME NOT
OUT SIDE
TELL ME EXACTLY ANY LIE THAT THIS WORLD IS NOT
CONTROLLED BY POLITICS AND MONEY and who exactly
are they I PERSONALLY DON'T GIVE A DAMN WHAT
CULTURE RELIGION CUNTRY THEY ARE FROM
FORGET THE THEORY THAT GOVT ADMINISTER LAW AND
MONEY IS A MEANS OF EXCHANGE
IF YOU ARE NOT PART OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER BE
PREPARED TO DIE A DEATH OF THE WORLD AS IT USED
TO BE
What do you or anybody not understand about
permaculture any god damn single thing if you
can find anything give me you're complete data
base of your researches on the web or in the
hidden web
LOVE
Martin
Robert Waldrop <bwaldrop@cox.net> wrote:
I've read this email several times, and I can't
get past the blatant anti-semitism of the first
paragraph. I am sad that you think so little of
this group and the people who read it to make
such
a racist comment in the context of a
permaculture
discussion. Racist bigotry has nothing to do
with
permaculture, if you think that it does, you
know
nothing of permaculture. Your loose talk
depersonalizes human beings based on race and
ethnicity for political motives, and that is the
first step towards genocide.
Bob Waldrop, Oklahoma City
----- Original Message -----
From: "Martin Naylor"
To: "permaculture"
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 12:16 PM
Subject: Re: [permaculture] The Fed
who was that clown Woodrow Wilson[and what did
he say-i have just done the biggest mistake in
history by giving the fucking clowns control of
the financial assets of the world to the
fucking
Jews,just after they sent senator F. H. King on
a journey around the world to report on stuff
[ Farmers of 40 centuries- although i drought
that,and he reported back farmers of forty
centuries ] that if you get into oil deserts
will increase and depletion of soil will result
The reason PERMACULTURE IS NOT WIDE SPREAD IS
BECAUSE MR BILL MOLLISON DECLARED WE WILL NOT
BE SCUMMED BY THE AUTHORITIES -LIKE IT OR NOT -
Paul Cereghino
wrote:
"why is it that permaculture [as an example of
decentralized ecological
design] has such a small cult following in the
US rather than having
broad attention and appeal?".
I suspect because the educational system, does
not support it
I learned about permaculture by going to
college, and though the college
didn't teach permaculture, it did teach a range
of skills that I have
retrofitted, and it gave me resources with
which
to make choices about
how I apply my life energy to affect the fabric
of human ecologies.
There is a little of the chicken or the egg
here, in that you need
people who think ecological design to teach
ecological design... I
wonder if integration into primary and
secondary
education would be more
powerful? Over the last 20 years there are
increasing academic programs
teaching 'holistic' stuff, and this is because
they are competing for
students who demand 'holistic' stuff. The
populice and the dominant
economic model doesn't support it, and the
educational system is just a
service provider.
I want to redirect the character of this
analysis -- this idea that Pc
doesn't thrive because of 'them' or 'the
system'. That is just the easy
way out. If we are such good designers, then
lets design! The problem
is the solution, right... so show me! Least
action greatest response?
Show me! Why is it when we come to human
systems
we throw up our hands
and say 'the system' is flawed? Perhaps we are
just ignorant of the
actual design context?!
there are not vast economic dependanciesminds of policy makers
associated with it, in the
material returns of investors, rather thanthe natural world
address the investments of
you might find yourself working as a
carpenter.
I think these combine -- Pc doesnt produce
revenue that can be
concentrated to produce a lobbying force or a
political caucus.
Pc offers guilt free subsistance but the
potential for emotionally
stressful isolation. It is land dependant, but
land ownership is
concentrated, and it is difficult to own land
outside the
investment-mortgage system without fleeing
population centers -- so
again, isolation. Then there is also increasing
insecurity in becoming old.
The uncertainties of business are beingcustomers to behave in a way to allow for a
minimized by causing the
significant return beyond
expenditures.
The horrific irony is that 'causing the
customers to behave' part is
very penetrating and pervasive. It is a
economic
landscape phenomena
that must be overcome. The Pc idea is that you
invest the surplus in
the land -- not give it to a shareholder. So
you
limit you
'constituency'. Pc has a very limited
'constituency'. Economic
interest groups use their surplus to influence
the economic landscape
for the benefit of their industry. Pc is busy
working on soil fertility
on land they have barely secured, while the
rest
of the world is
creating the cultural infrastructure in support
of their revenue
streams. The Pc answer is that the rest of the
word will fall apart and
settle into Pc and so we focus on soil rather
then 'the system' or 'the
man'. Is that a safe or accurate assumption?
I think land ownership is central to this
thread. If I owned land
outright, I would have more options, but I
trade
work for land over a
lifetime, and to squirrel away capital for
future security. Although I
deviate from norms quite substantially, some of
my behaviors are quite
normal, because they are driven by economic
insecurity context.
If your not perceived by those pulling theacceptable your going to be swimming up stream
strings in society as
a
lot.
But only when you are dependant on string
pulling, i.e. you are not
generating your own revenue, not generating
your
own power, rather you
are trying to appeal to a non-functioning
populist ideal and you go
appealing to the string-pullers and find that
they have no interest or
use for you. If you want to redirect the stream
you learn the stream
dynamics and start looking for weakness in the
bank where you can cause
an avulsion.
Permaculture is a frontier and that is why youpeople out there. It is not what
don't find lots of
has been going on the last 10,000 in
agriculture.
Perhaps I am an unforgiving perfectionist, but
I
am not convinced that
our designs are so spankin' special at this
point.
Paul Cereghino
_______________________________________________
permaculture mailing list
permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/permaculture
-go to the above link to subscribe to or
unsubscribe from this list-
---------------------------------
How would you spend $50,000 to create a more
sustainable environment in Australia? Go to
Yahoo!7 Answers and share your idea.
_______________________________________________
permaculture mailing list
permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/permaculture
-go to the above link to subscribe to or
unsubscribe from this list-
_______________________________________________
permaculture mailing list
permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/permaculture
-go to the above link to subscribe to or
unsubscribe from this list-
To live outside the law you must be honest- Mr
Robert Dylan
BEWARE OF TRASH:
One particular four-year old prayed, "And
forgive us our 'trash baskets' as we forgive
those who put trash in our baskets."
Unkown
---------------------------------
How would you spend $50,000 to create a more
sustainable environment in Australia? Go to
Yahoo!7 Answers and share your idea.
_______________________________________________
permaculture mailing list
permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/permaculture
-go to the above link to subscribe to or
unsubscribe from this list-
_______________________________________________
permaculture mailing list
permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/permaculture
-go to the above link to subscribe to or unsubscribe from this list-
-
Re: [permaculture] The Fed
, (continued)
- Re: [permaculture] The Fed, Felicity Wright, 05/20/2007
- Re: [permaculture] The Fed, Lawrence F. London, Jr., 05/20/2007
- Re: [permaculture] Metta, Felicity Wright, 05/20/2007
- Re: [permaculture] Metta, Lawrence F. London, Jr., 05/20/2007
- [permaculture] martin naylor's anti-semitism, Penny Powell, 05/20/2007
- [permaculture] Anti-semitism was Re: The Fed, Robert Waldrop, 05/19/2007
- Re: [permaculture] Anti-semitism was Re: The Fed, Martin Naylor, 05/19/2007
- Re: [permaculture] Anti-semitism was Re: The Fed, Robert Waldrop, 05/19/2007
- Re: [permaculture] Anti-semitism was Re: The Fed, Martin Naylor, 05/19/2007
- Re: [permaculture] Anti-semitism was Re: The Fed, Michael Snow, 05/20/2007
- Re: [permaculture] Anti-semitism was Re: The Fed, Robert Waldrop, 05/20/2007
- Re: [permaculture] The Fed, Lawrence F. London, Jr., 05/12/2007
- Re: [permaculture] The Fed, Lawrence F. London, Jr., 05/12/2007
-
Re: [permaculture] The Fed,
Tommy Tolson, 05/18/2007
- Re: [permaculture] The Fed, KNat, 05/19/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.