cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
- From: "Nic Suzor" <nic AT suzor.com>
- To: "Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts" <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject)
- Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 13:18:36 +1000
On 12/5/06, drew Roberts <zotz AT 100jamz.com> wrote:
So, you know for a fact that non-DRM games cannot play on these systems? I am
ignorant in this area. Would Sony grant a Free certification or whatever for
copyleft works?
That's right. There's a lock in the combination of the regional access
code and the boot ROM of PlayStation consoles and games which allow
only signed code to run. I've never seen a suggestion that Sony would
allow free developers to sign their code (or sign the code for them
gratis), but I don't want to preclude the possibility.
They can always contact me an make a deal. Or use your stuff, you can grant an
exception. Somehow I am sure.
Of course they can always contact you and make a deal. But the beauty
of CC licences is that people don't need to ask permission first.
I wouldn't, but I would be OK with a PD requirement being added to the current
proposal. And I would be OK with my previous attempt at a compromise
proposal.
I would be OK with that compromise. I still feel that there's some
problems, but it would alleviate the problem of my mother not being
able to apply her own TPMs.
nic.
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Fwd: Parallel Distribution and Non-Copyleft Licenses
, (continued)
- Re: [cc-licenses] Fwd: Parallel Distribution and Non-Copyleft Licenses, James Grimmelmann, 12/03/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Fwd: Parallel Distribution and Non-Copyleft Licenses, Greg London, 12/03/2006
- [cc-licenses] (no subject), Greg London, 12/04/2006
- [cc-licenses] par-dist should switch to cc-by and call it a day., Greg London, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), drew Roberts, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Nic Suzor, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), drew Roberts, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Nic Suzor, 12/04/2006
- Message not available
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Nic Suzor, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), drew Roberts, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Nic Suzor, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Terry Hancock, 12/05/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Benj. Mako Hill, 12/05/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Terry Hancock, 12/06/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Terry Hancock, 12/05/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Benj. Mako Hill, 12/05/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), James Grimmelmann, 12/05/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Terry Hancock, 12/06/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Greg London, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Nic Suzor, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), drew Roberts, 12/04/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.