cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
- From: Terry Hancock <hancock AT anansispaceworks.com>
- To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject)
- Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 11:32:29 -0600
James Grimmelmann wrote:
> I agree. I would prefer a parallel distribution clause, but given the
> present state of the discussion, holding the issue over and leaving the
> licenses unchanged for now would be appropriate.
I was under the impression that we'd already reached this conclusion
weeks ago. ;-)
I think you'll find that if the problems you predict from sticking to
the anti-TPM language actually materialize over the next year or so,
that many of us would reconsider our positions. But as it stands, these
objections are entirely academic, while the objections to TPM+PD are
clear and present dangers of exploitation and abuse which would affect
not only future works, but existing works as well.
Cheers,
Terry
--
Terry Hancock (hancock AT AnansiSpaceworks.com)
Anansi Spaceworks http://www.AnansiSpaceworks.com
-
Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject)
, (continued)
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Nic Suzor, 12/04/2006
- Message not available
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Nic Suzor, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), drew Roberts, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Nic Suzor, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Terry Hancock, 12/05/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Benj. Mako Hill, 12/05/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Terry Hancock, 12/06/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Terry Hancock, 12/05/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Benj. Mako Hill, 12/05/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), James Grimmelmann, 12/05/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Terry Hancock, 12/06/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Greg London, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Nic Suzor, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), drew Roberts, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Nic Suzor, 12/04/2006
- Message not available
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Nic Suzor, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), drew Roberts, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Greg London, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Nic Suzor, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), rob, 12/05/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Greg London, 12/05/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.