cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
- From: "Benj. Mako Hill" <mako AT atdot.cc>
- To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject)
- Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 22:09:17 -0500
<quote who="Terry Hancock" date="Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 11:19:47PM -0600">
> I think this is wrong-headed. The safest choice is to leave things as
> they are. It is always possible to introduce a TPM+PD exception in the
> future, if it becomes clear that one is needed.
>
> OTOH, there is no way to take it back, once it's done.
>
> Furthermore, it applies retro-actively to currently licensed works!
>
> So there are significant grounds to adopt a conservative attitude.
I think I agree with your prescription but for different reasons.
While, unlike you, I'm not ready to declare consensus, it seems obvious
that the issue is highly contested. In that light, it seem both
inappropriate and unlikely to change from the status quo.
regards,
Makko
--
Benjamin Mako Hill
mako AT atdot.cc
http://mako.cc/
Creativity can be a social contribution, but only in so
far as society is free to use the results. --RMS
-
Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject)
, (continued)
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Nic Suzor, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), drew Roberts, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Nic Suzor, 12/04/2006
- Message not available
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Nic Suzor, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), drew Roberts, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Nic Suzor, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Terry Hancock, 12/05/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Benj. Mako Hill, 12/05/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Terry Hancock, 12/06/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Terry Hancock, 12/05/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Benj. Mako Hill, 12/05/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), James Grimmelmann, 12/05/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Terry Hancock, 12/06/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Greg London, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Nic Suzor, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), drew Roberts, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Nic Suzor, 12/04/2006
- Message not available
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Nic Suzor, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), drew Roberts, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Greg London, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Nic Suzor, 12/04/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.