cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
- From: drew Roberts <zotz AT 100jamz.com>
- To: nic AT suzor.com, Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject)
- Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 21:39:44 -0500
On Monday 04 December 2006 09:18 pm, Nic Suzor wrote:
> On 12/5/06, drew Roberts <zotz AT 100jamz.com> wrote:
> > Clear.
> >
> > And are you aware of any systems that are like this now? Ones that your
> > mother and grandfather have?
>
> I have no examples of pure readers which currently do this. I suspect
> that there may be some ebook readers which require formats which are
> technically not free to apply, but I don't have any direct experience.
> I would hope that the reason I don't know any of these systems is
> because nobody would buy one, but I think that would be
> overly-optimistic.
>
> On the other hand, there are many commercial systems like the
> PlayStation or the XBox, where I would love to see an independent
> developer use CC-licensed works and free software to create a release
> title, and then raise some funding to obtain the certification
> required to release.
So, you know for a fact that non-DRM games cannot play on these systems? I am
ignorant in this area. Would Sony grant a Free certification or whatever for
copyleft works?
They can always contact me an make a deal. Or use your stuff, you can grant
an
exception. Somehow I am sure.
>
> I hope that the lack of worst-case examples is not seen to negative
> the need for a PD clause. The worst-case scenario that you are forced
> to pay to access your own work on a locked platform is the extreme
> side of the argument against PD, and I am saying that I would be
> prepared to accept a licence which allowed that,
I wouldn't, but I would be OK with a PD requirement being added to the
current
proposal. And I would be OK with my previous attempt at a compromise
proposal.
> as long as my content
> (plus improvements) were also available in cleartext.
My content and improvements (or mess ups) must indeed be available in the
clear for me to be happy.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> nic.
--
(da idea man)
National Novel Writing Month
Sayings (Winner 2006)
http://www.ourmedia.org/node/262954
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Fwd: Parallel Distribution and Non-Copyleft Licenses
, (continued)
- Re: [cc-licenses] Fwd: Parallel Distribution and Non-Copyleft Licenses, drew Roberts, 12/02/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Fwd: Parallel Distribution and Non-Copyleft Licenses, James Grimmelmann, 12/03/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Fwd: Parallel Distribution and Non-Copyleft Licenses, Greg London, 12/03/2006
- [cc-licenses] (no subject), Greg London, 12/04/2006
- [cc-licenses] par-dist should switch to cc-by and call it a day., Greg London, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), drew Roberts, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Nic Suzor, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), drew Roberts, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Nic Suzor, 12/04/2006
- Message not available
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Nic Suzor, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), drew Roberts, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Nic Suzor, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Terry Hancock, 12/05/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Benj. Mako Hill, 12/05/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Terry Hancock, 12/06/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Terry Hancock, 12/05/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Benj. Mako Hill, 12/05/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), James Grimmelmann, 12/05/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Terry Hancock, 12/06/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Greg London, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Nic Suzor, 12/04/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.