cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: [cc-licenses] Maybe Dual Licensing is the solution.
- From: drew Roberts <zotz AT 100jamz.com>
- To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Maybe Dual Licensing is the solution.
- Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 22:12:13 -0500
On Monday 04 December 2006 09:55 pm, Greg London wrote:
> There is a business model in the GNU-GPL community
> where people take a work and release it under the
> GNU-GPL license. They (or a small group) do the
> entire application code. They do not accept outside
> contributions. They then license their work under
> GNU-GPL.
Well, some do, but they require assignments or permissions to dual license.
People can still follow this model with CC licenses if they like.
>
> And then they make their money by selling proprietary
> licenses to that very same code.
>
> For those of you who are willing to allow someone
> a commercial monopoly on some particular platform,
> I suggest that you take your content and do like
> the dual-licensers do. License your work CC-SA
> and contribute it to some larger community, and
> then when some proprietary company wants the exclusive
> rights to use that content on their DRM-Only hardware
> platform, dual license your content. Give the proprietary
> vendor a CC-BY license to use your work on their
> platform, let them have sole right to commercial advantage
> on that platform, and everyone should be happy.
They don't even have to give the vendor a BY license, thay can give him the
BY-SA with the PD clause that they want.
>
> Oh, wait, you want EVERYONE to sign their rights
> away to this proprietary vendor????
>
> I think I see the problem....
all the best,
drew
--
(da idea man)
National Novel Writing Month
Sayings (Winner 2006)
http://www.ourmedia.org/node/262954
-
Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject)
, (continued)
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), rob, 12/05/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Greg London, 12/04/2006
- [cc-licenses] Maybe Dual Licensing is the solution., Greg London, 12/04/2006
- [cc-licenses] Will CC-BY allow DRM?, Greg London, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Will CC-BY allow DRM?, drew Roberts, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Will CC-BY allow DRM?, James Grimmelmann, 12/06/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Will CC-BY allow DRM?, drew Roberts, 12/06/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Will CC-BY allow DRM?, Mia Garlick, 12/06/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Will CC-BY allow DRM?, drew Roberts, 12/06/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Will CC-BY allow DRM?, Terry Hancock, 12/05/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Maybe Dual Licensing is the solution., drew Roberts, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Maybe Dual Licensing is the solution., James Grimmelmann, 12/06/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Maybe Dual Licensing is the solution., Terry Hancock, 12/06/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Two Part ParDist is same as AntiTPM, Greg London, 12/02/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Two Part ParDist is same as AntiTPM, drew Roberts, 12/02/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Two Part ParDist is same as AntiTPM, drew Roberts, 12/02/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Two Part ParDist is same as AntiTPM, Greg London, 12/02/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Two Part ParDist is same as AntiTPM, drew Roberts, 12/02/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Two Part ParDist is same as AntiTPM, Greg London, 12/03/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Two Part ParDist is same as AntiTPM, drew Roberts, 12/03/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Two Part ParDist is same as AntiTPM, Francesco Poli, 12/03/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.