Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

baslinux - Re: [BL] /lib/cpp error compiling in BL2 with libc-2.2.5 upgrade

baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Baslinux mailing list

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: sindi keesan <keesan AT sdf.lonestar.org>
  • To: baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [BL] /lib/cpp error compiling in BL2 with libc-2.2.5 upgrade
  • Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 01:40:12 +0000 (UTC)


I can't see any reason not to upgrade to SW91 glibc. How did they
actually get it smaller?

I found a reason. The lynx that I compiled completely statically (on a computer with SW81 glibcso and SW71 full glibc), which works offline with BL3 but not online, does the same now with SW91 glibc and cxxlibs.

Not a dynamically compiled executable so why won't it work with any glibc-so except the one that was on the computer when I compiled it? I think it works with original BL2 (SW71 glibcso) and I know it does with SW81 glibcso.

I tried to put back SW81 glibcso and it won't go.
Downgrading libraries appears to be impossible. I could copy over all the so files from another computer and run ldconfig, I suppose.

ld-linux.so.2 - GLIBC_PRIVATE not found. required by /lib/libc.so.6
which is statically linked. What is GLIBC_PRIVATE?

linuxpackages.net has it for SW91 and not for SW81. 2.8.5rel 1 Feb 2004 is still the latest release.

David, do you have time to download my lynx package and figure this out? Why would a statically compiled version work only with glibc 2.2.5 and nothing older OR newer when it has no dependencies?

I think I should not compile statically, a lot of problems and no advantage except to other people. And not even that in this case.

Kermit and links and opera work.




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page