sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64

From: sergey AT optimaltec.com
To: SM-Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 09:11:50 -0500

Let's create a Wiki page about AMD64. I did a bare one here:
http://wiki.sourcemage.org/index.php?page=AMD64+Status

Quoting Benoit PAPILLAULT <benoit.papillault AT sourcemage.org>:

> Cool. The best would be to post bugs for x86-64 related problem (so I
> know which devel spells I need to use right now). BTW, can someone
> please add x86-64 architecture in our bugzilla? Right now, we only have
> "All", "PPC", "x86", "Sparc" and "Other"!

Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64 , (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, David Michael Leo Brown Jr., 04/04/2005
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, Andrew, 04/04/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, David Michael Leo Brown Jr., 04/05/2005
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, Eric Sandall, 04/05/2005
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, Benoit PAPILLAULT, 04/05/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, David Michael Leo Brown Jr., 04/05/2005
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, Benoit PAPILLAULT, 04/05/2005
    - Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, sergey, 04/05/2005
      - Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, Benoit PAPILLAULT, 04/06/2005
        
        Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, sergey, 04/06/2005
        
        Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, Benoit PAPILLAULT, 04/06/2005
        
        Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, sergey, 04/06/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, David Michael Leo Brown Jr., 04/05/2005
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, David Kowis, 04/05/2005
    - Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, sergey, 04/06/2005
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, sergey, 04/06/2005
    - Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, Eric Sandall, 04/06/2005
      - Updated X.org in devel; was: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, sergey, 04/06/2005
        
        Re: Updated X.org in devel; was: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, Flavien Bridault, 04/06/2005
        
        Re: Updated X.org in devel; was: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, Flavien Bridault, 04/06/2005