sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64

From: "David Michael Leo Brown Jr." <dmlb2000 AT excite.com>
To: eric AT sandall.us, sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 00:48:16 -0400 (EDT)

>Why not make archspecs for your architecture instead of modifying someone
>else's
>to work on yours?

I'm not suggesting changing, I'm suggesting integrating the current
x86_[32,64]
files to k8_[32,64] files then changing x86_[32,64] files to properly
advertize
what the file name suggests.

- David Brown

_______________________________________________
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!

[SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, David Michael Leo Brown Jr., 04/04/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, Andrew, 04/04/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, David Kowis, 04/05/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, Eric Sandall, 04/05/2005
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, Andrew, 04/05/2005
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, David Michael Leo Brown Jr., 04/04/2005
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, Andrew, 04/04/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, David Michael Leo Brown Jr., 04/05/2005
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, Eric Sandall, 04/05/2005
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, Benoit PAPILLAULT, 04/05/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, David Michael Leo Brown Jr., 04/05/2005
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, Benoit PAPILLAULT, 04/05/2005
    - Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, sergey, 04/05/2005
      - Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, Benoit PAPILLAULT, 04/06/2005
        
        Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, sergey, 04/06/2005
        
        Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, Benoit PAPILLAULT, 04/06/2005
        
        Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, sergey, 04/06/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, David Michael Leo Brown Jr., 04/05/2005