sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: sergey AT optimaltec.com
- To: Benoit PAPILLAULT <benoit.papillault AT sourcemage.org>
- Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64
- Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 15:52:09 -0500
I have a pure 64-bit system without multilib too. I also made a full sorcery
rebuild, which was successful with devel grimoire. All fixes are submitted to
their respective spells. I will be integrating them into test soon.
After installing from the ISO, I booted from a Knoppix CD, moved all stuff
from
/lib64 to /lib and from /usr/lib64 to /usr/lib, then made symlinks. Both gcc
and g++ now have "no multilib" option that is the default on x86_64.
/etc/ld.so.conf only has /lib, /usr/lib and /usr/X11R6/lib.
I had to add "#define HaveLib64 NO" to host.def for xorg. That's enough to
build
it, but not enough to run :-). Xorg's ELF loader fails on startx.
There are several spells that misbehave on 64-bit system. Some has bad
assembler
inside, some don't recognize the archspecs, etc. Some are easily fixable,
others... I have no idea.
Quoting Benoit PAPILLAULT <benoit.papillault AT sourcemage.org>:
> David Michael Leo Brown Jr. a écrit :
> > As far as the ISO's are concerned I used your x86_64 test3 iso to
> install...
> > after a bunch of fiddleing I have a pure 64 bit system... no multilib...
> and
> > I'm building up a personal grimoire that has fixes for spells to use
> > x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu for the host (several don't seem to see it as
> valid)
>
> Cool. This x86-64 ISO is really working :-). Could you submit your patch
> to the official grimoire or post your post to bugzilla? I'm in the
> process of building a new chroot (on a true x86-64 sourcemage install
> this time!) and got some problem myself.
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, David Kowis, 04/05/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64,
Eric Sandall, 04/05/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, Andrew, 04/05/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64,
David Michael Leo Brown Jr., 04/04/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, Andrew, 04/04/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64,
David Michael Leo Brown Jr., 04/05/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, Eric Sandall, 04/05/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, Benoit PAPILLAULT, 04/05/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64,
David Michael Leo Brown Jr., 04/05/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 04/05/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64,
sergey, 04/05/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 04/06/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64,
sergey, 04/06/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 04/06/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, sergey, 04/06/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 04/06/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64,
sergey, 04/06/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 04/06/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64,
sergey, 04/05/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 04/05/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64,
David Michael Leo Brown Jr., 04/05/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64,
David Kowis, 04/05/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, sergey, 04/06/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64,
sergey, 04/06/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64,
Eric Sandall, 04/06/2005
- Updated X.org in devel; was: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, sergey, 04/06/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64,
Eric Sandall, 04/06/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64,
David Kowis, 04/05/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.