sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64

From: Benoit PAPILLAULT <benoit.papillault AT sourcemage.org>
To: SM-Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 16:33:07 +0200

sergey AT optimaltec.com a écrit :

Let's create a Wiki page about AMD64. I did a bare one here:
http://wiki.sourcemage.org/index.php?page=AMD64+Status

Great. It looks like a good starting point. However, what is said on the page seems to apply to 0.9.4-test2 ISO since 0.9.4-test3 ISO is pure 64 bits only. Would you mind if I make some corrections? (after wiki is let anyone edit the page).

Benoit PAPILLAULT, ISO guru

Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64 , (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, David Michael Leo Brown Jr., 04/04/2005
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, Andrew, 04/04/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, David Michael Leo Brown Jr., 04/05/2005
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, Eric Sandall, 04/05/2005
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, Benoit PAPILLAULT, 04/05/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, David Michael Leo Brown Jr., 04/05/2005
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, Benoit PAPILLAULT, 04/05/2005
    - Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, sergey, 04/05/2005
      - Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, Benoit PAPILLAULT, 04/06/2005
        
        Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, sergey, 04/06/2005
        
        Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, Benoit PAPILLAULT, 04/06/2005
        
        Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, sergey, 04/06/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, David Michael Leo Brown Jr., 04/05/2005
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, David Kowis, 04/05/2005
    - Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, sergey, 04/06/2005
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, sergey, 04/06/2005
    - Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, Eric Sandall, 04/06/2005
      - Updated X.org in devel; was: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, sergey, 04/06/2005
        
        Re: Updated X.org in devel; was: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, Flavien Bridault, 04/06/2005
        
        Re: Updated X.org in devel; was: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, Flavien Bridault, 04/06/2005
        
        Re: Updated X.org in devel; was: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, Flavien Bridault, 04/06/2005