Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Geoffrey Derber <Geoffrey.Derber AT Trinity.edu>]

Eric Sandall wrote:
> Eric Schabell said:
>
> > > What's the point of having a z-rejected grimoire if all the other
> > > available
> > > grimoires have a z-rejected section?
> >
> > Well, the z-rejected grimoire is only for our own grimoire
> > (devel|test|stable)
> > rejected stuff, games for example has it's own rejected section as I don't
> > want to have to look for games in another grimoires just because they have
> > been rejected!
>
>
> I've decided that we're going to hold off splitting the rest of the
> grimoire until we figure out a few things:

My question wasn't so much about splitting off the rest of the grimoire, 
as to which of the two new grimoires rejected games should go into, 
rejected or games.
> 1) Dependencies across grimoires
> 2) Naming conventions
> 3) Most things in the main grimoire most servers can use, so do we even
> want to split the rest? (I've heard that perhaps 'kde' and 'gnome' could
> be split and leave the rest).
>
> Also, for naming conventions, I'd like the following in 'games' and
> 'z-rejected' so that their sections don't conflict with those in the main
> grimoire:
>
> games/games-<section>
> z-rejected/z-<section>   (It'd become greatly tedious to type
> 'z-rejected-<section>')
>
> Thoughts?

Sounds good to me, I was just keeping the same names for z-rejected so 
far but adding the 'z-' does help distinquish them some.

Geoff