Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Jason Flatt <jason AT flattfamily.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday 22 June 2003 11:19 pm, Eric Schabell wrote:
> > > A question, since we now have the two new grimoires, I noticed a
> > > z-rejected section in the games grimoire, which contained enemy
> > > territory, and I also have that in the z-rejected grimoire in the games
> > > section.
> > >
> > > I think this is something we should set the precident for now.  How are
> > > we going to do this?  Will we allow other grimoires to contain a
> > > z-rejected section? or will all rejected spells go into the z-rejected
> > > grimoire?
>
> I would prefer to leave this up to the Grimoire Lead, but being a purist, I
> love to keep the original naming around. Every grimoire should have a
> z-rejected section.
>
> I agree to moving the one we originally had out (size questions), so now we
> know where to put our z-rejected stuff. With every possible coming grimoire
> you will find spells that do not fit in the grimoire w/o a z-rejected
> section (this is with a 'z-' btw!) so you are all on the right track as far
> as I am concerned. Keep the tradition alive, keep the z-rejected in each
> seperate grimoire.


What's the point of having a z-rejected grimoire if all the other available 
grimoires have a z-rejected section?


- -- 
Jason Flatt (jason @ flattfamily . com)
Father of five (http://www.flattfamily.com/)
Linux user (http://www.sourcemage.org/)
PGP Key: E992213F - 0254 9DB7 BE0E 312D 8352 6E39 0700 FB95 E992 213F
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE++FTjBwD7lemSIT8RAikpAKCFU0JbXVfudE0I6cuaSsJJHafnQgCdGylG
AITdDhrfEbxzh68v5UfwaJE=
=smUN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----