Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Geoffrey Derber <Geoffrey.Derber AT Trinity.edu>
  • To: Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>
  • Cc: eschabell AT sourcemage.org, Tony Smith <tony AT smee.org>, sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org, Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?
  • Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2003 22:14:14 -0500

Geoffrey Derber wrote:
Hamish Greig wrote:


Thank you Tony!
Eric and Eric my tree is done, please look over it and notify me of anything you want changed.
Hamish


A question, since we now have the two new grimoires, I noticed a z-rejected section in the games grimoire, which contained enemy territory, and I also have that in the z-rejected grimoire in the games section.

I think this is something we should set the precident for now. How are we going to do this? Will we allow other grimoires to contain a z-rejected section? or will all rejected spells go into the z-rejected grimoire?

If we decide the later, I think Hamish really want's to maintain the et spell, which I don't mind since w/ my current connection it'd take me 24hrs just to download the sucker. So another question is for Tony, does Hamish have access to the z-rejected grimoire, or just games?

Geoff


I only had Tony's reply on this. What does everyone else think? I really think this is something that should be worked out.

Geoff





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page