Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?
  • Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 18:34:32 +0200

On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 03:02:11PM +0100, Tony Smith wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 June 2003 11:59 am, Eric Schabell wrote:
> > > OK, I'm about to do this. Here's the summary of what I plan to do:
> > >
> > > 1. Branch (devel) games and z-rejected into their own areas with only
> > > one
> > > section each (which I'll capriciously call "games"/"z-rejected")
> > >
> > > 2. Grant Geoff and Hamish access to their new locations.
> > >
> > > 3. Delete games and z-rejected from their devel/test/stable locations
> > > 4. Alter my tarball building scripts to build tarballs for these
> > > grimoires too.
> > > 5. Publish the first tarball for each.
> > > 6. Schedule hourly rebuilds when changes occur.
> > >
> > > Any comments before I get cracking?
> >
> > Grimoire Team Lead,
> >
> > Keep in mind that an announcement is needed here once it is all taken care
> > of, good work all!
>
> 'Tis done.
>
> T

One problem with moving those section to their own grimoires, several
spells in video now depend on a non-existing spell for users that don't
have z-rejected (xvid). What should we do about this?

--
Arwed v. Merkatz
Grimoire Guru for video
Sourcemage GNU/Linux
http://www.sourcemage.org




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page