sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?
- From: "Eric Sandall" <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?
- Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 08:50:36 -0700 (PDT)
Eric Schabell said:
>> What's the point of having a z-rejected grimoire if all the other
>> available
>> grimoires have a z-rejected section?
>>
> Well, the z-rejected grimoire is only for our own grimoire
> (devel|test|stable)
> rejected stuff, games for example has it's own rejected section as I don't
> want to have to look for games in another grimoires just because they have
> been rejected!
I've decided that we're going to hold off splitting the rest of the
grimoire until we figure out a few things:
1) Dependencies across grimoires
2) Naming conventions
3) Most things in the main grimoire most servers can use, so do we even
want to split the rest? (I've heard that perhaps 'kde' and 'gnome' could
be split and leave the rest).
Also, for naming conventions, I'd like the following in 'games' and
'z-rejected' so that their sections don't conflict with those in the main
grimoire:
games/games-<section>
z-rejected/z-<section> (It'd become greatly tedious to type
'z-rejected-<section>')
Thoughts?
-sandalle
--
PGP Key Fingerprint: FCFF 26A1 BE21 08F4 BB91 FAED 1D7B 7D74 A8EF DD61
http://search.keyserver.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xA8EFDD61
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?, Eric Schabell, 06/17/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?, Tony Smith, 06/17/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?, Eric Sandall, 06/17/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?, Hamish Greig, 06/17/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?, Geoffrey Derber, 06/17/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?, Tony Smith, 06/17/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?, Geoffrey Derber, 06/22/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?, Eric Schabell, 06/23/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?, Jason Flatt, 06/24/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?, Eric Schabell, 06/24/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?, Eric Sandall, 06/24/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?, Geoffrey Derber, 06/24/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?, Eric Sandall, 06/24/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?, Geoffrey Derber, 06/24/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?, Ladislav Hagara, 06/24/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?, Eric Sandall, 06/24/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?, Eric Schabell, 06/25/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?, Jason Flatt, 06/25/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?, Arwed von Merkatz, 06/17/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?, Arwed von Merkatz, 06/17/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?, Dufflebunk, 06/17/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.