Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Eric Sandall" <eric AT sandall.us>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?
  • Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 08:50:36 -0700 (PDT)

Eric Schabell said:
>> What's the point of having a z-rejected grimoire if all the other
>> available
>> grimoires have a z-rejected section?
>>
> Well, the z-rejected grimoire is only for our own grimoire
> (devel|test|stable)
> rejected stuff, games for example has it's own rejected section as I don't
> want to have to look for games in another grimoires just because they have
> been rejected!

I've decided that we're going to hold off splitting the rest of the
grimoire until we figure out a few things:

1) Dependencies across grimoires
2) Naming conventions
3) Most things in the main grimoire most servers can use, so do we even
want to split the rest? (I've heard that perhaps 'kde' and 'gnome' could
be split and leave the rest).

Also, for naming conventions, I'd like the following in 'games' and
'z-rejected' so that their sections don't conflict with those in the main
grimoire:

games/games-<section>
z-rejected/z-<section> (It'd become greatly tedious to type
'z-rejected-<section>')

Thoughts?

-sandalle

--
PGP Key Fingerprint: FCFF 26A1 BE21 08F4 BB91 FAED 1D7B 7D74 A8EF DD61
http://search.keyserver.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xA8EFDD61

Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page