sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?
- From: Jason Flatt <jason AT flattfamily.com>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?
- Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 06:23:04 -0700
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 24 June 2003 01:34 pm, Ladislav Hagara wrote:
>
> > games/games-<section>
>
> I agree. It will not as confusing as now it is.
> For example we have http section in every grimoires. It was be better to
> have games-http and z-rejected-http sections.
>
It was my understanding that multiple grimoires were to be designed to be
layered onto each other, so that multiple http sections looked like one big
section when using the various sorcery tools. That's certainly not the way
it's happening now, and many of the tools (or options in the case of gaze)
won't work on anything except the main grimoire.
>
> Changes in grimoire should be mentioned on wiki because users usually do
> not read mailing lists.
> I modified http://wiki.sourcemage.org/index.php?page=Codex a little.
>
> - lace -
>
I both agree and disagree. I pay far more attention to the mail lists than I
do the wiki, forums or news page. I believe, however, that major changes
like this should be splattered around as much as possible. Don't give anyone
a reason to whine. :^)
- --
Jason Flatt (jason @ flattfamily . com)
Father of five (http://www.flattfamily.com/)
Linux user (http://www.sourcemage.org/)
PGP Key: E992213F - 0254 9DB7 BE0E 312D 8352 6E39 0700 FB95 E992 213F
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE++aI4BwD7lemSIT8RAqFWAKCBX4iTgOg3HpNAU9X+WI7dLZPAuACgjzSb
UYTKcpi34eyT8fXH3cJct00=
=BWia
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?, Eric Schabell, 06/23/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?, Jason Flatt, 06/24/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?, Eric Schabell, 06/24/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?, Eric Sandall, 06/24/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?, Geoffrey Derber, 06/24/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?, Eric Sandall, 06/24/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?, Geoffrey Derber, 06/24/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?, Ladislav Hagara, 06/24/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?, Eric Sandall, 06/24/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?, Eric Schabell, 06/25/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?, Jason Flatt, 06/25/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?, Arwed von Merkatz, 06/17/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?, Arwed von Merkatz, 06/17/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?, Dufflebunk, 06/17/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?, Arwed von Merkatz, 06/17/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 06/16/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?, Eric Schabell, 06/17/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.