Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>
  • To: sm-discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?
  • Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 19:16:17 +0200

So a non-existant function is called for non-existant spells ... sounds
right, all is well then ;)

On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 11:58:58AM -0400, Dufflebunk wrote:
> This is what the non-existant private_remove_dependees function in
> libdepends is for.
>
> On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 12:48, Arwed von Merkatz wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 06:34:32PM +0200, Arwed von Merkatz wrote:
> >
> > > One problem with moving those section to their own grimoires, several
> > > spells in video now depend on a non-existing spell for users that don't
> > > have z-rejected (xvid). What should we do about this?
> >
> > The same will be the case for the whole java section ...
> > Maybe sorcery could ask the user if it should abort when it encounters
> > an optional_depends or depends that doesn't exist, so the user can add
> > the grimoire containing it? I guess we would then need a search function
> > on the website to check what grimoire contains a specific spell.
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
>
>

--
Arwed v. Merkatz
Grimoire Guru for video
Sourcemage GNU/Linux
http://www.sourcemage.org




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page