Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Ladislav Hagara <hgr AT vabo.cz>
  • Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?
  • Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 22:34:14 +0200

> 1) Dependencies across grimoires

Why more splitting ?
I think to have z-rejected separated is sufficient.
Of course we can have core-grimoire, server-grimoire, x11-grimoire,
gnome-grimoire, kde-grimoire but it causes only a lot of problems.
It was be more useful if we could download grimoire by rsync, cvs or p4.

BTW, what is with codex.sourcemage.org ?
It offers only very old grimoires. :-((

> games/games-<section>

I agree. It will not as confusing as now it is.
For example we have http section in every grimoires. It was be better to have
games-http and z-rejected-http sections.

> z-rejected/z-<section> (It'd become greatly tedious to type

BTW, why z-rejected, why not only "rejected" ?
Is it planned to have z-rejected-devel, z-rejected-test and z-rejected-stable,
games ditto ?


Changes in grimoire should be mentioned on wiki because users usually do not
read mailing lists.
I modified http://wiki.sourcemage.org/index.php?page=Codex a little.

- lace -












Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page