Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?
  • Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 23:35:22 +0200

On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 04:18:24PM -0500, Geoffrey Derber wrote:
> I'm all for moving z-rejected into it's own grimoire. I've been for it
> for months. For that particular section, I felt, if we're going to
> reject something, either completely move it out of the main grimoire so
> that the user makes a conscous effort to have them available through a
> scribe add, or to just add the warning message and integrate them into
> the main grimoire, not set them off to the side. In other words, all or
> nothing, with preference given to all. A second reason for moving it
> out had to do with the fact that it mirrored the main grimoire so well.
> Spells from every other part of the grimoire were appearing, and by
> making it a grimoire, we could add multiple sections with in it for
> where each spell would belong if they were not rejected.
>
> Anyways, if we're going to do this, let me know, and I'll begin work on
> setting it up as a grimoire.

A 'rejected/binary' grimoire sounds very good to me. One question about
that: Will the sources of spells in there be mirrored? I'm asking
because that could possibly go against licenses (like xvid, which
doesn't allow redistribution in the usa and japan).

--
Arwed v. Merkatz
Grimoire Guru for video
Sourcemage GNU/Linux
http://www.sourcemage.org




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page