internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: Edward Wesolowski <edwes AT idisplay.com>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Re: [internetworkers] nc.rr.com
- Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 10:11:56 -0500
>I just chalk it up to some mystery "beth's posts are usually stupid" filter and figure it's probably for the best.
Not!
...now, now, now. This technology isn't personal;-) ...right?
I agree it does seem like some kind of filter, tho, where the sender doesn't receive their own posting (altho I use to get my own postings! ...something's changed!)
Does some INWer have an explanation?
Ed W.
At 08:54 AM 1/7/2004 -0500, you wrote:
Sil Greene <Sil_greene AT unc.edu> wrote:
>
>I think (not certain) I saw your message come across. Someone else
>complained of this the other day, and I knew for certain their message had
>reached my inbox. I'm on ibiblio tho, so I'm a little closer to the
>originating mailserver.
This happens to me all the time. I post stuff to INW and never see it in my mailbox. I just chalk it up to some mystery "beth's posts are usually stupid" filter and figure it's probably for the best.
Beth
__________________________________________________________________
Thank you for using Netscape.
---
Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site! http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
To unsubscribe visit http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
-
Re: Why home phone service at all? RE: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?
, (continued)
- Re: Why home phone service at all? RE: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?, Thomas Beckett, 01/12/2004
- Re: Why home phone service at all? RE: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?, K. Jo Garner, 01/12/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] nc.rr.com,
Calvin Powers, 01/06/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] nc.rr.com,
Sil Greene, 01/06/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] nc.rr.com, Roger Austin, 01/06/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] nc.rr.com,
Sil Greene, 01/06/2004
- Fwd: Re: Re: [internetworkers] nc.rr.com, Edward Wesolowski, 01/06/2004
-
Fwd: Re: Re: [internetworkers] nc.rr.com,
Edward Wesolowski, 01/07/2004
- Re: Fwd: Re: Re: [internetworkers] nc.rr.com, Sil Greene, 01/07/2004
-
Message not available
- Re: Fwd: Re: Re: [internetworkers] nc.rr.com, Edward Wesolowski, 01/07/2004
-
Re: Fwd: Re: Re: [internetworkers] nc.rr.com,
Beth, 01/07/2004
-
Re: Fwd: Re: Re: [internetworkers] nc.rr.com,
Edward Wesolowski, 01/07/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] nc.rr.com, David R . Matusiak, 01/07/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] nc.rr.com, Tom Boucher, 01/07/2004
-
Re: Fwd: Re: Re: [internetworkers] nc.rr.com,
Edward Wesolowski, 01/07/2004
-
Re: Fwd: Re: Re: [internetworkers] nc.rr.com,
Beth, 01/07/2004
- Re: Fwd: Re: Re: [internetworkers] nc.rr.com, Tanner Lovelace, 01/07/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] nc.rr.com,
Welna, Sarah (NIH/NIEHS), 01/08/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] nc.rr.com, Steve Burnett, 01/08/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] nc.rr.com, Mark Turner, 01/08/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] nc.rr.com,
David R . Matusiak, 01/08/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] nc.rr.com, Edward Wesolowski, 01/08/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] nc.rr.com, Ron Thigpen, 01/08/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.