internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: Edward Wesolowski <edwes AT idisplay.com>
- To: internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Fwd: Re: Re: [internetworkers] nc.rr.com
- Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 10:24:37 -0500
...ditto. & the price may be a tad better too!you can always get the cable modem w/o RR, via Earthlink (same
physical network). Same speeds, better (IMHO) news/smtp/etc. servers
Ed W.
At 10:38 PM 1/5/2004 -0500, you wrote:
> i don't use it, but I dislike RR, since they've blacklisted the mac.com
> domain. argh.
you can always get the cable modem w/o RR, via Earthlink (same
physical network). Same speeds, better (IMHO) news/smtp/etc. servers
--
James Manning <http://www.sublogic.com/james/>
GPG Key fingerprint = B913 2FBD 14A9 CE18 B2B7 9C8E A0BF B026 EEBB F6E4
---
Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site! http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
To unsubscribe visit http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
-
Re: Why home phone service at all? RE: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?
, (continued)
- Re: Why home phone service at all? RE: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?, Jeremy Portzer, 01/12/2004
- Re: Why home phone service at all? RE: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?, K. Jo Garner, 01/12/2004
- Re: Why home phone service at all? RE: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?, Jeremy Portzer, 01/12/2004
- Re: Why home phone service at all? RE: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?, David R . Matusiak, 01/12/2004
- Re: Why home phone service at all? RE: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?, Tom Boucher, 01/12/2004
- Re: Why home phone service at all? RE: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?, Thomas Beckett, 01/12/2004
- Re: Why home phone service at all? RE: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?, K. Jo Garner, 01/12/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] nc.rr.com,
Sil Greene, 01/06/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] nc.rr.com, Roger Austin, 01/06/2004
- Re: Fwd: Re: Re: [internetworkers] nc.rr.com, Sil Greene, 01/07/2004
-
Message not available
- Re: Fwd: Re: Re: [internetworkers] nc.rr.com, Edward Wesolowski, 01/07/2004
-
Re: Fwd: Re: Re: [internetworkers] nc.rr.com,
Edward Wesolowski, 01/07/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] nc.rr.com, David R . Matusiak, 01/07/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] nc.rr.com, Tom Boucher, 01/07/2004
- Re: Fwd: Re: Re: [internetworkers] nc.rr.com, Tanner Lovelace, 01/07/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.