Homestead mailing list

["Lynda" <lurine AT softcom.net>]

Ray, if they aren't effective then you are saying your leader is a liar.  He 
says they are effective.  Y'all need to get together and make up your 
collective minds.

BTW, Ray, he isn't tapping foreign nationals.  He is tapping anyone who 
"they" have decided might be a suspect.  He also admitted that.

Also, a little history reading might help you, Ray.  The reference was to J. 
Edgar Hoover.

And, if you're married, or have a mother or sister available, I think they 
might be able to explain to you the difference between a dress and a 
skirt/kilt.  They aren't synonomous.

Lynda
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <rayzentz AT aol.com>


> Again, the laws in question apply to citizens.   C I T I Z E N S.   US 
> ones.   Again, if you are on some foreign terror suspects speed dial, 
> refer to my last post.   Those laws don't apply to the executive branch 
> when tapping foreign nationals.   He is not thumbing his nose.   He is 
> right.
>
> Does it really bother you who wears dresses and who doesn't.   Almost 
> every scotsman I know does from time to time (although they get really 
> upset if you refer to it as a dress), and they seem ok.
>
> As far as proof regarding effectiveness.   I have a friend who is a 
> private investigator, and who deals with wiretaps (on citizen's, I might 
> add) and he says wiretaps are not effective.   It is the rare occasion 
> when they are that make it all worth the effort.
>
> Ray