Homestead mailing list

[DSanner106 AT aol.com]

In a message dated 1/25/2006 11:17:57 AM Eastern Standard Time,  d
on.bowen AT earthlink.net writes:

<The 4th amendment, illegal search and seizure with wiretaps on US  citizens 
<without a search warrant.


 
Bush did call on leaders of both parties, and requested a ruling from  
whitehouse attourneys on the legality of this before proceeding, It has , of  
course, not been determined he did anything at all wrong here, or that  
Presidential 
powers in time of war do not allow this, so to state this as a  violation is 
incorrect. Personally, if the President, no matter who he or she  is gets a 
call saying the terrorists we are tracking, that have promised  attacks in 
the 
US are calling people in the US, I would hope they would make  the same 
decision every time. The first job of our Gov. is to protect us, and  this is 
a Known 
enemy.


<Overuse of signing statements when he wants to ignore laws  passed by 
<congress.



Now this one, I don't get, what do you mean by this???
 

<Iraq WMD.
 
Congress agreed on the existence of WMD, Clinton agreed, and those multi-  
mile long convoys of trucks our satelite photos show entering and exiting  
several suspected deposit sites and heading for Syria, before the inspectors  
arrived lead me to believe they were all correct. Besides, It is a fact the  
WMD 
existed, the debate was over whether they had been destroyed per agreement  
by 
the Iraqi's. After throwing the inspectors out, they claim to have finished  
the job on their own, but neither the physical or written evidence exists of  
this. Saddam threw out the inspectors, stated he would NOT destroy any more 
of  
his WMD. But you believe he actually did destroy them????  Why???

<And so on.
 
We'll see
 
Drew