homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Homestead mailing list
List archive
Re: [Homestead] Nuclear energy in an oil-poor world
- From: "Wendy" <crazygardens AT verizon.net>
- To: <homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [Homestead] Nuclear energy in an oil-poor world
- Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 00:31:35 -0400
At 6/1/2005, you wrote:
I cannot see using solar as a stand-alone system. My planer has a five
horsepower motor. Batteries would never handle the starting load.
Do batteries start your car?
Very different loads and batteries. To start an AC load such as a
synchronous motor, you have to contend with huge inrush currents before
back EMF increases the load and reduces the current. The high starting
loads add to the power requirements. Inverters are sometimes designed to
handle those surge currents but they do drag the battery into low voltage.
Sometimes the inverter will see this low voltage and shut down.
Deep cycle and marine batteries are designed for steady current drain to
get maximum capacity. SLI (starting, lighting, ignition) batteries are
designed to generate large amounts of current quickly then just as quickly
recharge. The starter motor is a fractional horse power motor so has
smaller inrush currents, also as both field and stator coils are
energized, back EMF builds much more quickly.
Don Bowen Awl Knotted Up
You are absolutely right, Don. It is not a good comparison. What is
usually done with RE systems, is the AC motors are replaced with DC motors.
If you add a clutch and gear assembly that allows the motor to start
no-load, then the load is applied more gradually, would place even less
stress on the batteries. I wouldn't want to use an inverter anywhere except
where it was absolutely necessary. For the most part, they are an
unnecessary expense and a waste of power.
Wendy
-
Re: [Homestead] Nuclear energy in an oil-poor world
, (continued)
-
Re: [Homestead] Nuclear energy in an oil-poor world,
Lynda, 06/01/2005
-
Re: [Homestead] Nuclear energy in an oil-poor world,
Gene GeRue, 06/01/2005
-
Re: [Homestead] Nuclear energy in an oil-poor world,
Don Bowen, 06/01/2005
- Re: [Homestead] Nuclear energy in an oil-poor world, Gene GeRue, 06/01/2005
-
Re: [Homestead] Nuclear energy in an oil-poor world,
Don Bowen, 06/01/2005
-
Re: [Homestead] Nuclear energy in an oil-poor world,
Gene GeRue, 06/01/2005
-
Re: [Homestead] Nuclear energy in an oil-poor world,
Wendy, 06/01/2005
-
Re: [Homestead] Nuclear energy in an oil-poor world,
Gene GeRue, 06/01/2005
-
Re: [Homestead] Nuclear energy in an oil-poor world,
Wendy, 06/01/2005
-
Re: [Homestead] Nuclear energy in an oil-poor world,
Gene GeRue, 06/01/2005
-
Re: [Homestead] Nuclear energy in an oil-poor world,
Wendy, 06/01/2005
- Re: [Homestead] Nuclear energy in an oil-poor world, Don Bowen, 06/01/2005
- Re: [Homestead] Nuclear energy in an oil-poor world, Wendy, 06/02/2005
- Re: [Homestead] Nuclear energy in an oil-poor world, Don Bowen, 06/02/2005
-
Re: [Homestead] Nuclear energy in an oil-poor world,
Wendy, 06/01/2005
- Re: [Homestead] Nuclear energy in an oil-poor world, Gene GeRue, 06/02/2005
- Re: [Homestead] Nuclear energy in an oil-poor world, Kathyann Natkie, 06/02/2005
- Re: [Homestead] Nuclear energy in an oil-poor world, Wendy, 06/06/2005
- Re: [Homestead] Nuclear energy in an oil-poor world, Kathyann Natkie, 06/06/2005
-
Re: [Homestead] Nuclear energy in an oil-poor world,
Gene GeRue, 06/01/2005
-
Re: [Homestead] Nuclear energy in an oil-poor world,
Wendy, 06/01/2005
-
Re: [Homestead] Nuclear energy in an oil-poor world,
Gene GeRue, 06/01/2005
-
Re: [Homestead] Nuclear energy in an oil-poor world,
Don Bowen, 06/01/2005
- Re: [Homestead] Nuclear energy in an oil-poor world, Gene GeRue, 06/02/2005
- [Homestead] water power was: oil-poor world, Don Bowen, 06/02/2005
- Re: [Homestead] water power was: oil-poor world, Gene GeRue, 06/02/2005
- Re: [Homestead] water power was: oil-poor world, Rob, 06/02/2005
-
Re: [Homestead] Nuclear energy in an oil-poor world,
Lynda, 06/01/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.