List archive

• Re: [cc-licenses] Comments on the second public CC draft , (continued)
  • Re: [cc-licenses] Comments on the second public CC draft, Francesco Poli, 01/22/2007
• [cc-licenses] Question about BY and SA licenses, OSS, 01/19/2007
  • Re: [cc-licenses] Question about BY and SA licenses, Mike Linksvayer, 01/19/2007
  • Re: [cc-licenses] Question about BY and SA licenses, Jonathon, 01/20/2007
    • Re: [cc-licenses] Question about BY and SA licenses, Mike Linksvayer, 01/20/2007
      • Re: [cc-licenses] Question about BY and SA licenses, James Grimmelmann, 01/20/2007
      • Re: [cc-licenses] Question about BY and SA licenses, Evan Prodromou, 01/20/2007
      • Re: [cc-licenses] Question about BY and SA licenses, Greg London, 01/20/2007
      • Re: [cc-licenses] Question about BY and SA licenses, Luis Villa, 01/20/2007
      • Re: [cc-licenses] Question about BY and SA licenses, Greg London, 01/20/2007
      • Re: [cc-licenses] Question about BY and SA licenses, Evan Prodromou, 01/21/2007
      • Re: [cc-licenses] Question about BY and SA licenses, James Grimmelmann, 01/21/2007
• [cc-licenses] Citizendium project requests advice on licenses, Tim Chambers, 01/20/2007
  • Re: [cc-licenses] Citizendium project requests advice on licenses, Jaroslaw Lipszyc, 01/20/2007
• [cc-licenses] Public Domain Dedication, OSS, 01/23/2007
• [cc-licenses] Is BY-ND a good choice for an Internet XML-based protocol specification?, Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves, 01/24/2007
  • Re: [cc-licenses] Is BY-ND a good choice for an Internet XML-based protocol specification?, James Grimmelmann, 01/24/2007
    • Re: [cc-licenses] Is BY-ND a good choice for an Internet XML-based protocol specification?, Evan Prodromou, 01/24/2007
      • Re: [cc-licenses] Is BY-ND a good choice for an Internet XML-based protocol specification?, James Grimmelmann, 01/24/2007
      • Re: [cc-licenses] Is BY-ND a good choice for an Internet XML-based protocol specification?, Lucas Gonze, 01/24/2007
      • Re: [cc-licenses] Is BY-ND a good choice for an Internet XML-based protocol specification?, Luis Villa, 01/24/2007
      • Re: [cc-licenses] Is BY-ND a good choice for an Internet XML-based protocol specification?, Lucas Gonze, 01/24/2007
      • Re: [cc-licenses] Is BY-ND a good choice for an Internet XML-based protocol specification?, Luis Villa, 01/24/2007
• Re: [cc-licenses] Is BY-ND a good choice for an Internet, Ŭalabio‽, 01/24/2007
• Re: [cc-licenses] Is BY-ND a good choice for an Internet ¡Hello! ¿How fare you? Firstly CC is a jack of all trades, but master of none. Secondly, CC-BY-ND could make it impossible for anyone but your friend to improve it. This is what I would do: GPL it and if you want multilicense it under CC-BY-SA and GFDL with no invariant sections too for good measure. That would ensure that other could build on it, if they make their changes freely available s that others could freely implement them. Here is more specific information: *-<HTTP://WikiPedia.org/wiki/GPL> *-<HTTP://WikiPedia.Org/wiki/GFDL> Remember that the essential license is the GPL. The others are just nice extras to use too. ¡Peace! -- "Ŭalabio‽" <Walabio AT MacOSX.Com> The first Intactivistic wiki on Earth devoted to Genital Integrity: *-<HTTP://PeaceFulBeginnings.Org/>, Ŭalabio‽, 01/24/2007
• [cc-licenses] Dual CC Licensing, OSS, 01/25/2007
  • Re: [cc-licenses] Dual CC Licensing, Mike Linksvayer, 01/25/2007
• Re: [cc-licenses] CC enforcement, Mark Brown, 01/25/2007
• [cc-licenses] Slashdot Thread On "Proving Creative Commons Licensing of a Work?", rob, 01/29/2007
  • Re: [cc-licenses] Slashdot Thread On "Proving Creative Commons Licensing of a Work?", Mathias Klang, 01/29/2007

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.