cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Re: [cc-licenses] Is BY-ND a good choice for an Internet ¡Hello! ¿How fare you? Firstly CC is a jack of all trades, but master of none. Secondly, CC-BY-ND could make it impossible for anyone but your friend to improve it. This is what I would do: GPL it and if you want multilicense it under CC-BY-SA and GFDL with no invariant sections too for good measure. That would ensure that other could build on it, if they make their changes freely available s that others could freely implement them. Here is more specific information: -<HTTP://WikiPedia.org/wiki/GPL> -<HTTP://WikiPedia.Org/wiki/GFDL> Remember that the essential license is the GPL. The others are just nice extras to use too. ¡Peace! -- "Ŭalabio‽" <Walabio AT MacOSX.Com> The first Intactivistic wiki on Earth devoted to Genital Integrity: *-<HTTP://PeaceFulBeginnings.Org/>

From: Ŭalabio‽ <Walabio AT MacOSX.Com>
To: justivo AT gmail.com, cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Is BY-ND a good choice for an Internet ¡Hello! ¿How fare you? Firstly CC is a jack of all trades, but master of none. Secondly, CC-BY-ND could make it impossible for anyone but your friend to improve it. This is what I would do: GPL it and if you want multilicense it under CC-BY-SA and GFDL with no invariant sections too for good measure. That would ensure that other could build on it, if they make their changes freely available s that others could freely implement them. Here is more specific information: *-<HTTP://WikiPedia.org/wiki/GPL> *-<HTTP://WikiPedia.Org/wiki/GFDL> Remember that the essential license is the GPL. The others are just nice extras to use too. ¡Peace! -- "Ŭalabio‽" <Walabio AT MacOSX.Com> The first Intactivistic wiki on Earth devoted to Genital Integrity: *-<HTTP://PeaceFulBeginnings.Org/>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 00:34:19 +0000

¡Hello!

¿How fare you?

Firstly CC is a jack of all trades, but master of none. Secondly, CC-BY-ND could make it impossible for anyone but your friend to improve it. This is what I would do:

GPL it and if you want multilicense it under CC-BY-SA and GFDL with no invariant sections too for good measure. That would ensure that other could build on it, if they make their changes freely available s that others could freely implement them. Here is more specific information:

* - <HTTP://WikiPedia.org/wiki/GPL>
* - <HTTP://WikiPedia.Org/wiki/GFDL>

Remember that the essential license is the GPL. The others are just nice extras to use too.

¡Peace!

--

"Ŭalabio‽" <Walabio AT MacOSX.Com>

The first Intactivistic wiki on Earth devoted to Genital Integrity:

* - <HTTP://PeaceFulBeginnings.Org/>

Re: [cc-licenses] Is BY-ND a good choice for an Internet ¡Hello! ¿How fare you? Firstly CC is a jack of all trades, but master of none. Secondly, CC-BY-ND could make it impossible for anyone but your friend to improve it. This is what I would do: GPL it and if you want multilicense it under CC-BY-SA and GFDL with no invariant sections too for good measure. That would ensure that other could build on it, if they make their changes freely available s that others could freely implement them. Here is more specific information: *-<HTTP://WikiPedia.org/wiki/GPL> *-<HTTP://WikiPedia.Org/wiki/GFDL> Remember that the essential license is the GPL. The others are just nice extras to use too. ¡Peace! -- "Ŭalabio‽" <Walabio AT MacOSX.Com> The first Intactivistic wiki on Earth devoted to Genital Integrity: *-<HTTP://PeaceFulBeginnings.Org/>, Ŭalabio‽, 01/24/2007