Development of Creative Commons licenses

[Ŭalabio‽ <Walabio AT MacOSX.Com>]

        ¡Hello!

        ¿How fare you?

	Firstly CC is a jack of all trades, but master of none.  Secondly,  
CC-BY-ND could make it impossible for anyone but your friend to  
improve it.  This is what I would do:

	GPL it and if you want multilicense it under CC-BY-SA and GFDL with  
no invariant sections too for good measure.  That would ensure that  
other could build on it, if they make their changes freely available  
s that others could freely implement them.  Here is more specific  
information:

        *       -       <HTTP://WikiPedia.org/wiki/GPL>
        *       -       <HTTP://WikiPedia.Org/wiki/GFDL>

	Remember that the essential license is the GPL.  The others are just  
nice extras to use too.

        ¡Peace!

--

        "Ŭalabio‽" <Walabio AT MacOSX.Com>

        The first Intactivistic wiki on Earth devoted to Genital Integrity:

        *       -       <HTTP://PeaceFulBeginnings.Org/>