cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
- From: "Benj. Mako Hill" <mako AT atdot.cc>
- To: cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [cc-licenses] Discussion
- Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 22:19:32 -0500
<quote who="Bjorn Wijers" date="Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 11:59:11PM +0100">
> I would also like to have some time to think about the arguments brought
> forward instead of - in my case - jumping into a discussion haphazardly.
> Would it be acceptable to have some form of time-out so people like me
> have at least the chance to catch up and participate into this
> discussion? Or as Paul Keller once proposed a maximum of emails on this
> particular discussion per day?
It seems like good advice -- although I'm saying this in my 5th email to
the list today. :)
There are 7-8 people who have contributed between 30 and 90 emails to
this discussion so far. If you're one of them, there's a decent chance
that you've repeated yourself a bit. Those of us, and I'm guilty of this
as well, might want to consider standing down a little bit or taking the
back-and-forths off the list.
If you *haven't* spoken up, it would be great to hear from you!
Regards,
Mako
--
Benjamin Mako Hill
mako AT atdot.cc
http://mako.cc/
Creativity can be a social contribution, but only in so
far as society is free to use the results. --RMS
-
Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject)
, (continued)
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Nic Suzor, 12/04/2006
- Message not available
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Nic Suzor, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), drew Roberts, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Greg London, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Nic Suzor, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), rob, 12/05/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Greg London, 12/05/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), rob, 12/05/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Alek Tarkowski, 12/05/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Bjorn Wijers, 12/05/2006
- [cc-licenses] Discussion, Benj. Mako Hill, 12/05/2006
- [cc-licenses] ParDist does not address commercial monopoly, Greg London, 12/06/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] ParDist does not address commercial monopoly, Greg London, 12/06/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), James Grimmelmann, 12/06/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), rob, 12/05/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] (no subject), Greg London, 12/04/2006
- [cc-licenses] Maybe Dual Licensing is the solution., Greg London, 12/04/2006
- [cc-licenses] Will CC-BY allow DRM?, Greg London, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Will CC-BY allow DRM?, drew Roberts, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Will CC-BY allow DRM?, James Grimmelmann, 12/06/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Will CC-BY allow DRM?, drew Roberts, 12/06/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.